CHALLENGES AND INTERACTION STRATEGIES OF LOGISTICS COMPANIES IN THE FMCG SECTOR UNDER CONDITIONS TO SIXTH-ORDER TECHNOLOGIES TRANSITION
Abstract
The article presents the results of a qualitative study based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with senior managers and executives of logistics and manufacturing companies operating in the FMCG sector across different regions of Ukraine, conducted between June 2025 and March 2026. The purpose of the study is to systematise current logistics challenges, identify technology adoption strategies, and map interaction models among market participants under conditions of transition to the sixth technological paradigm. The sample is formed using purposive sampling to ensure geographic coverage and diversity by company size and type. Five key challenge clusters are identified: personnel deficit (mentioned by 100 % of respondents), driven by military mobilisation, emigration, and workforce feminisation; security risks (90 %), manifesting as route instability, shelling of vehicles and warehouses, and closure of up to 30 % of localities for commercial delivery; financial constraints (85 %), including fuel cost escalation and limited access to investment capital; technology polarisation (75 %), reflecting a sharp asymmetry between large companies and SMEs; and regulatory and standardisation uncertainty (70 %). The study identifies the phenomenon of "dual-track adaptation", organisations simultaneously pursuing short-term survival strategies (route changes, decentralised warehousing, atypical recruitment) and long-term transformational investment (automation, robotics, digitalisation). A second key finding is "technological fatalism" among small businesses, a self-reinforcing belief that wartime conditions render innovation impossible. A three-option standardisation matrix (self-development; industry alliance; awaiting state standard) is proposed, with most large FMCG logistic companies preferring self-development followed by state endorsement. Standardisation is already occurring through the market power of national retail chains, confirming the "standardisation-through-market-power" concept. Policy implications are formulated for business, government, and the academic community.
References
Autor D. H. Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2015. Vol. 29, No. 3. PР. 3-30.
Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3, No. 2. РP. 77-101.
Creswell J. W., Poth C. N. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. London : SAGE Publications, 2018. 488 p.
David P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75, No. 2. PР. 332-337. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805621
Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature. 1988. Vol. 26, No. 3. PР. 1120-1171.
Gartner Identifies Top Supply Chain Technology Trends for 2025. 2025. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-18-gartner-identifies-top-supply-chain-technology-trends-for-2025 (дата звернення: 01.02.2026).
GS1. GS1 Global Traceability Standard. 2nd ed. Brussels : GS1 AISBL, 2017. URL: https://www.gs1.org/standards/traceability/traceability/2-0 (дата звернення: 01.02.2026).
Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75, No. 3. PР. 424-440. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814809 (дата звернення: 01.02.2026).
Kovács G., Spens K. Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2007. Vol. 37, No. 2. PР. 99-114.
Лебедева Л., Шкуропадська Д. Стійкість транспортної логістики ЄС та України. Ius Modernum. 2024, 135, 4, С.108-127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(135)07
March J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science. 1991. Vol. 2, No. 1. PР. 71–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McKinsey & Company. McKinsey Technology Trends Outlook 2025. McKinsey Global Institute, 2025. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/the-top-trends-in-tech (дата звернення: 10.01.2026).
Posner M. V. International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Economic Papers. 1961. Vol. 13, No. 3. PР. 323–341.
Rona-Tas A., Hiss S. Forecasting as valuation. Beckert J., Aspers P. (eds.). The Worth of Goods. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2011.
Samuels A. Digital transformation in supply chains: improving resilience and sustainability through AI, Blockchain, and IoT. Frontiers in Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1584580.
Standard ISO 22000 (HACCP). URL: https://iso.kiev.ua/iso-22000-haccp/standart-iso-22000-haccp-ukr.html (дата звернення: 01.02.2026)
Thomas A., Kopczak L. From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sector. San Francisco : Fritz Institute White Paper, 2005. 15 p.
Autor D. H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 3-30.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101.
Creswell J. W., Poth C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 488 p.
David P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 332-337. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805621
Dosi G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1120-1171.
Gartner (2025). Gartner Identifies Top Supply Chain Technology Trends for 2025. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-18-gartner-identifies-top-supply-chain-technology-trends-for-2025
GS1 (2017). GS1 Global Traceability Standard. Brussels: GS1 AISBL. Available at: https://www.gs1.org/standards/traceability/traceability/2-0
Katz M. L., Shapiro C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 424-440. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814809
Kovács G., Spens K. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 99-114.
Lebedeva L., Shkuropadska D. (2024) Stiikist transportnoi lohistyky YeS ta Ukrainy [Resilience of transport logistics of the EU and Ukraine]. Ius Modernum, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 108-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(135)07 (in Ukrainian)
March J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McKinsey & Company (2025). McKinsey Technology Trends Outlook 2025. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/the-top-trends-in-tech
Posner M. V. (1961). International Trade and Technical Change. Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 323-341.
Rona-Tas A., Hiss S. (2011). Forecasting as valuation. In: Beckert J., Aspers P. (eds.) The Worth of Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Samuels A. (2025). Digital transformation in supply chains: improving resilience and sustainability through AI, Blockchain, and IoT. Frontiers in Sustainability, vol. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1584580
ISO (2026). Standard ISO 22000 (HACCP). Available at: https://iso.kiev.ua/iso-22000-haccp/standart-iso-22000-haccp-ukr.html
Thomas A., Kopczak L. (2005.) From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sector. San Francisco: Fritz Institute White Paper, 15 p.
Copyright (c) 2026 Артем Біловол, Світлана Тарасенко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

